IADR Abstract Archives

Reliability of Masseter and Temporalis EMG recorded in Habitual Environments

Objectives: To determine the reliability of self-recordings made using portable EMG equipment in habitual environments.
Methods: Eighty-six subjects (52 women, 34 men; average age: 33±11 years) gave informed consent to participate in IRB-approved protocols. Each subject attended 2 laboratory visits. At both visits the same standardized molar biting tasks were performed on one side at a time while bite-force and EMG signals from bilateral masseter and anterior temporalis muscles were recorded via a pre-calibrated force transducer and bipolar surface electrodes, respectively. Root-mean-square muscle activities (mV) were plotted versus bite-force (N) for each muscle acting unilaterally and contralaterally to the bite-force and the resultant regression relations were used to calibrate subject- and muscle-specific ambulatory recordings. At visit 1 subjects learned to use the portable EMG recording equipment. At visit 2 subjects returned data and equipment after recording from masseter and anterior temporalis muscles on one selected side for 3 days and 3 nights in their habitual environments. Self-recordings for each subject and muscle were characterized relative to thresholds of EMG/20N bite-force (T20N) using muscle duty factors (DF=amount of time muscle activity at T20N during a given recording period, %). Reliabilities of muscle DFs for 6 recordings overall and 3 recordings for each time-period were assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC), where by definition, ICC: ≤0.40=low, 0.40-0.70=moderate, >0.70=high, if lower 95% confidence interval (CI) limit >0.00.
Results: Reliabilities of DFs overall were high for masseter (ICC=0.74) and low for temporalis (ICC=0.42) muscles (Table). Similarly, DF for day and night recordings were better for masseter (ICC=0.63 and 0.87, respectively) compared to temporalis (ICC=0.43 and 0.24, respectively) muscles.
Conclusions: Self-recordings of masseter muscle activities in habitual environments were highly reliable overall and particularly at night.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting: 2015 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Boston, Massachusetts)
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Year: 2015
Final Presentation ID: 1842
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Craniofacial Biology
Authors
  • Nickel, Jeffrey  ( University of Missouri - Kansas City , Kansas City , Missouri , United States )
  • Liu, Ying  ( University of Missouri - Kansas City , Kansas City , Missouri , United States )
  • Gonzalez-stucker, Yoly  ( University at Buffalo , Buffalo , New York , United States )
  • Liu, Hongzeng  ( University of Missouri - Kansas City , Kansas City , Missouri , United States )
  • Gallo, Luigi  ( Dental School KFS, University of Zurich , Zurich , Switzerland )
  • Iwasaki, Laura  ( University of Missouri - Kansas City , Kansas City , Missouri , United States )
  • Support Funding Agency/Grant Number: NIH R01 DE 016417
    Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Oral Session
    TMJ, Condyles and Chewing
    Friday, 03/13/2015 , 08:00AM - 09:30AM
    TABLES
    Table of Results
    Muscle Time ICC Lower-Upper 95% CI Limits
    Masseter Overall 0.74 0.72-0.75
    Day 0.63 0.59-0.66
    Night 0.87 0.86-0.88
    Temporalis Overall 0.42 0.39-0.46
    Day 0.43 0.38-0.48
    Night 0.24 0.18-0.31