IADR Abstract Archives

Occlusal Accuracy and Reproducibility of CERC Digital Impression

Objectives: Evaluate the occlusal accuracy and reproducibility obtained using the Sirona CEREC 4.2.5 SW and digital impression in achieving proper occlusion eliminating the need for physical models.
Methods: Fifteen (N=15) three unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) were fabricated on a standard preparation on ivorine teeth extending from 29-31 using Sirona 4.2.5 SW and direct digital impression. The prepared teeth were scanned using a Cerec blue cam. FPDs were divided into 3 groups (n=5/group) 1: full contour zirconia (Zr), 2: zirconia core veneered with milled Vita Triluxe Forte block using a split file technique (RLT) and 3: provisional material (Vita CAD Temp). Unprepared ivorine teeth were used as control. Occlusal contacts for all groups was measured and compared to that on control using a Faroarm machine.
Results: The occlusal contacts developed in all test groups when compared to that on control group shows differences in all three directions; Buccolingual (BL), Mesiodistal (MD) and Occlusalogingival (OG). RLT group shows the highest discrepancy and CADTemp the lowest. The table presents the average differences and direction between each test group and the control in µm.
Conclusions: FPD’s generated with Zr, RLT, and CADTemp using Sirona CEREC 4.2.5 SW showed deviation in all dimensions measured relative to the original unprepared teeth.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting: 2015 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Boston, Massachusetts)
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Year: 2015
Final Presentation ID: 3621
Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s): Prosthodontics Research
Authors
  • Alofi, Raneem  ( Boston University , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Giordano Ii, Russell  ( Boston University , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Pober, Richard  ( Boston University , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Financial Interest Disclosure: NONE
    SESSION INFORMATION
    Poster Session
    Computer Assisted Prosthodontics
    Saturday, 03/14/2015 , 02:00PM - 03:15PM
    TABLES
    Results: Average differences and direction between each test group and the control in µm.
    Group Tooth 29
    Microns Deviation
    Tooth 30
    Microns Deviation
    Tooth 31
    Microns Deviation
    ΔBL ΔMD ΔOG ΔBL ΔMD ΔOG ΔBL ΔMD ΔOG
    RLT 451±23 -244±17 -660 ±27 112±9 -112 ±6 -120 ±4 979 ± 4 -353 ±20 -708 ±6
    Zr 379 ±19 -19.9 ±7 259 ±13 33.5 ±2 -11.1 ±2 260 ±6 378 ±7 236 ±1 -178 ±6
    CAD
    Temp
    336 ±4 -24.2 ±5 196 ±6 -3.0 ±2 -17.6 ±2 182 ±2 227±1 191 ±7 -213 ±1