Detection of Primary Occlusal Caries With ICDAS, PTR/LUM and QLF
Objectives: Evaluate the performance of visual examination (International Caries Detection and Assessment System; ICDAS), Photothermal Radiometry and Modulated Luminescence, PTR/LUM, (The Canary System®; Quantum Dental Technologies, Toronto, Canada), and two Quantitative Light-Induced Fluorescence devices (QLF Inspektor Pro and QLF-D Biluminator™ 2; Inspektor Research Systems B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands) on detection of occlusal primary caries in vitro by three different examiners. Methods: Extracted human posterior teeth (N=60) with fully formed roots and no frank cavitations or restorations were selected from a pool of teeth (IU-IRB # 1302010696). A single site was selected on each occlusal surface to represent ICDAS scores “0” to “4”. Three calibrated examiners, guided by white-light images, assessed the sites independently using ICDAS, The Canary System®, Inspektor Pro and QLF-D twice with a 5-7 days interval between examinations. Histological validation was used to compare methods in regards to sensitivity, specificity and the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Examiners agreement and repeatability were measured using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC). Results: Sensitivity, specificity and AUC values were respectively: 0.82, 0.86 and 0.87 (ICDAS); 0.85, 0.43 and 0.79 (The Canary System®); 0.89, 0.60 and 0.90 (QLF Inspektor™ Pro); and 0.96, 0.57 and 0.94 (QLF-D). Intra-examiner repeatability range and inter-examiner agreement were respectively: 0.81-0.87: 0.72 and (ICDAS); 0.33-0.63: 0.48 (The Canary System®); 0.49-0.97: 0.73 (Inspektor™ Pro); and 0.96-0.99: 0.96 (QLF-D Biluminator™ 2). Conclusions: Visual examination using ICDAS criteria had the best combination of sensitivity, specificity and AUC for detection of early primary caries on occlusal surfaces. The Canary System® had the lowest specificity and AUC values. QLF systems demonstrate a potential for longitudinal monitoring given its high sensitivity and AUC and repeatability.
Division: IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
Meeting:2015 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Boston, Massachusetts) Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Year: 2015 Final Presentation ID:1064 Abstract Category|Abstract Category(s):Cariology Research - Detection, Risk Assessment and Others
Authors
Jallad, Mahmoud
( Community Health & Emergency Services
, Cairo
, Illinois
, United States
; Indiana University School of Dentistry
, Indianapolis
, Indiana
, United States
)
Ferreira Zandona, Andrea
( The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill - School of Dentistry
, Chapel Hill
, North Carolina
, United States
)
Zero, Domenick
( Oral Health Institute of Indiana University School of Dentistry
, Indianapolis
, Indiana
, United States
)
Eckert, George
( Indiana University School of Medicine
, Indianapolis
, Indiana
, United States
)
Financial Interest Disclosure: This study was partially supported by a grant from Delta Dental Foundation (Okemos, MI) and a grant from GlaxoSmithKline (GSK, Middlesex, UK). There is no conflict of interest for any of the authors.