IADR Abstract Archives

Dosimetry of Orthodontic Diagnostic FOVs Using Low Dose CBCT Protoco

Objectives: Effective doses resulting from combinations of field size and exposure parameters that might be used for orthodontic diagnosis tasks were acquired using a Promax 3D Mid CBCT unit. Specifically doses for a protocol involving reduced exposure and iterative reconstruction called “ultra low dose” (ULD) was compared with standard exposures. Contrast to noise ratio (CNR) and modulation transfer function (MTF) were calculated as quantitative measures of image quality.
Methods: Doses resulting from various combinations of field size, exposure protocol, and child or adult anthropomorphic phantoms using the Promax 3D MID CBCT unit (Helsinki, Finland) were measured with Optical Stimulated Luminescent (OSL) dosimetry using previously validated protocols (Ludlow et al.). A QUART DVT phantom was used to measure CNR and MTF. Standard and ULD image quality parameters were compared in a paired analysis.
Results: See tables.
Conclusions: An average reduction in dose of 77% was achieved using ULD protocols when compared with standard protocols. While this dose reduction was significant, no statistical reduction in image quality between ULD and standard protocols was seen. This would suggest that patient doses can be reduced without loss of diagnostic quality.
IADR/AADR/CADR General Session
2015 IADR/AADR/CADR General Session (Boston, Massachusetts)
Boston, Massachusetts
2015
0920
Diagnostic Sciences
  • Ludlow, John  ( University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill , North Carolina , United States )
  • Koivisto, Juha  ( University of Helsinki , Helsinki , Finland )
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research of the National Institutes of Health R21DE022160
    An honorarium and travel expenses were received by John Ludlow from Planmeca Oy, Finland Juha Koivisto is an employee of Planmeca Oy, Finland
    Poster Session
    Miscellaneous Diagnostic Techniques
    Thursday, 03/12/2015 , 03:30PM - 04:45PM
    Dose by phantom type and FOV
    Protocol Phantom volume (ø*h) Effective Dose (µSv)
    ULD Low Dose Adult 100*100 12
    ULD Normal 45
    Low Dose 60
    Normal 189
    ULD Low Dose 200*170 18
    ULD Normal 51
    Low Dose 72
    Normal 215
    ULD Low Dose Child 85*85 10
    ULD Normal 36
    Low Dose 48
    Normal 153
    ULD Low Dose 200*170 15
    ULD Normal 42
    Low Dose 74
    Normal 175

    Paired t-tests of ULD and standard protocols
    mean difference prob > │t│
    CNR 0.408 0.56
    MTF 10% 0.038 0.56
    MTF 50% 0.055 0.47