Methods: Cross-sectional data on 1943 patients (ages 2-93, 45% male) were obtained from the first PRECEDENT trial, which captured dental outcomes at 101 dental practices in the northwest United States. We estimated ICC for various treatment-pattern and disease outcomes, using generalized estimating equations (GEE) with exchangeable working covariance. We then investigated how these estimates change after adjustment for practice-level and patient-level covariates in the GEE regression framework.
Results: Our initial results show a tendency for variables that are more susceptible to dentist influence, such as use of prophylaxis or treatment type, to have high ICC (>0.11). Use of fluoride had especially high ICC (>0.5). Variables that are more patient-dependent, such as presence of disease, have comparatively low correlation (~0.05 to 0.1); however, even these relatively low ICC values may substantially impact statistical inference. ICC is attenuated slightly by adjustment for some practice-level covariates, such as DDS experience level, practice type, and state of residence, and to a lesser degree by adjustment for patient-level characteristics.
Conclusion: Higher ICC for variables that involve treatment choice may reflect differences in treatment approaches among dental practices. Correlation within dental practices can be quite high and have a large impact on inference.