Methods: The resin-cement materials examined in this study were MSM-107, Linkmax(GC), Variolink2(Ivoclar Vivadent), Multilink Automix(Ivoclar Vivadent), Panavia F2.0(Kuraray), Esthetic Cement(Kuraray) and Resicem(Shofu). The specimens were prepared by cementing(light-curing mode) bovine enamel and porcelain(GN1 Ceramic Block, GC) with each resin-cement according to manufacturers’ instructions. The cement-thickness was set at 150micrometer using plastic tape. The three body wear test was performed with original wear machine for 500,000-cycles. The specimens were dropped 10mm to appetite-block and reciprocated on appetite-block 8mm-length parallel to cement-line in the slurry mixture of PMMA-particles and Glycerin. WR was compared by measuring wear-depth which is difference in level between worn cement-line and porcelain(n=10).
Results: Mean values(SD) are shown below. asterisk(**) indicates significant difference(T-test, **: p<0.01,) compared with MSM-107 in the same column. MSM-107 showed significantly higher WR than other resin-cements tested.
Resin-Cement |
MSM-107 |
Linkmax |
Variolink2 |
Multilink Automix |
Panavia F2.0 |
Esthetic Cement |
Resicem |
Manufacturer |
GC |
GC |
Ivoclar Vivadent |
Ivoclar Vivadent |
Kuraray |
Kuraray |
Shofu |
WR[micrometer] |
12.4(0.7) |
23.1(1.3)** |
33.8(0.9)** |
34.8(0.9)** |
50.7(3.7)** |
51.8(3.0)** |
34.0(1.2)** |
Conclusions: MSM-107 demonstrates the highest wear resistance among the resin-cements. This result suggests that MSM-107 is suitable resin-cement for most clinical cases, including inlay restorations.